The Still River Bank Saga
Twenty-seven-year-old James Van Wert of Winsted, Connecticut, was arrested in Southwick, Massachusetts, at about 11:00 pm, Friday, February 3, 1860.
Authorities reportedly found him in bed with a woman
believed to be his wife's younger sister.
If, in fact, true, adultery was the least of his worries.
As the couple was leaving Baird's, they were recognized by
hotel proprietor Mr. Day, who happened to be in town. Finding it rather odd that they had had breakfast a second time, he compared the $3 bill his
establishment received to that of Baird's.
Meanwhile, the pair arrived at Chester Factories Village,
where they stopped and ate dinner. They continued on to Huntington. Stopping
there, they purchased 25 cents worth of beer and oats. At another store, they
bought a pair of 50-cent gloves. In Russell, they paid for pie and cheese with
a $3 bill before inquiring about the route to Westfield. For reasons unknown,
they turned off to Southwick.
During Van Wert's arrest in Southwick, authorities
discovered that he had thirteen $3 bills and two new 25-cent pieces in his
possession, all believed fake.
Van Wert was charged with one count of possessing
counterfeit money, two counts of passing counterfeit money, and two counts of
adultery. He was jailed in Lenox before being sentenced to the Massachusetts
State Prison at Charlestown (Boston), where he served six years doing hard
labor.
As pretend president of the so-called Still River Bank, Van
Wert had been arrested in January 1860, charged with swindling, but later
released pending further evidence. Because Van Wert's bogus bank had ties to
Canada, prosecuting him proved difficult, and he was released. His bank,
however, was forced to liquidate.
Still River Bank was being investigated after a reporter read an advertisement for it in a newspaper in 1859 and flagged it as possibly illegal. The ad read, in part, "Still River Bank, Winsted, Connecticut,
J. L. Van Wert President..." Yet, there was no such bank in Winsted.
Newspapers across the country sounded the warning. They
advised folks to watch out for Still River currency; the bills circulating in
Canada primarily were tens, fives, and ones, all poorly printed on coarse
paper.
Van Wert married again in 1870. With his new wife, Harriet, he had two children: Charles, born in 1870, and Harriet, born in 1872.
Jewelry Heist
James L. Daniels' jewelry store in Sandisfield was relieved of almost all of its contents after a break-in on October 19, 1870. The thieves were tracked to James Van Wert's farm in Tolland, Massachusetts. A search of the sprawling Van Wert farm turned up nothing, but authorities made it abundantly clear that they had zero doubt of his guilt.In 1874, a local bank started foreclosing on the properties. That same year, the Van Werts divorced, with Harriet raising the children.
Charles grew up not knowing his father; his mother had told him his father was
dead - a secret she took to the grave.
Multiple lawsuits were eventually filed. It is believed that the court ordered most of the properties to be sold at auction, and in 1878, Van Wert's property in Tolland was seized, along with all its timber, cut and uncut.
Conclusion
James married Ellen Putnam in Holyoke on December 22, 1880. She gave birth to a daughter in July of the following year.
Western Massachusetts and northwestern Connecticut residents were probably
not surprised when Van Wert (along with his new wife) was charged with
swindling as president of a gigantic "bank" operation in Colorado in
April 1881.
James and Ellen divorced in 1886.
When James died in 1906, his son Charles, a watchmaker in
Colorado Springs, was surprised to learn that he would inherit about $6 million
as part of his father's estate worth approximately $18 million, including more
than 1 million acres of land.